LinkedIn , What’s Wrong With My Posts?
LinkedIn loves to talk about “connection.” About “community.” About “voice.” Yet here I am: 1,900 followers, and my posts scrape by with 10 to 30 impressions. That’s not connection. That’s erasure.
This isn’t a glitch. It’s gatekeeping dressed up as algorithm. A velvet rope disguised as engagement metrics. The platform decides who gets visibility, who gets buried, who gets the illusion of reach.
The irony? LinkedIn positions itself as the town square for professionals. But the square is fenced. The microphone is rationed. The algorithm is the bouncer, and most of us are left outside, shouting into the void.
What’s wrong with my posts? Nothing. They are English, clear, direct, unapologetic. They carry critique, they carry stance. But LinkedIn doesn’t reward stance—it rewards conformity. It rewards the safe, the bland, the already‑validated.
Gatekeeping is not just about impressions. It’s about dignity. It’s about who gets to be heard, who gets to be seen, who gets to matter. And when a platform throttles reach, it’s not neutral—it’s a choice. A choice to silence. A choice to curate invisibility.
LinkedIn, you don’t need to explain the math. You need to explain the morality. Why build a network only to choke it? Why invite voices only to bury them? Why promise agency only to ration it?
The issue is not my posts. The issue is your walls.
---
No comments:
Post a Comment